Litigation over lithium batteries is likely to increase as the
long-lasting batteries are used in new applications. The higher-profile
cases to date have involved electronic cigarette batteries, hoverboards
and mobile phones.
Tesla
There have been numerous reports of Tesla vehicles catching fire due to improper functioning of the vehicle’s thermal management system. A reported 232 incidents have occurred, with litigation centered around the effect of lithium-ion batteries on these systems. On November 4, 2025, after a deadly crash of one of Tesla’s Model S vehicles where the individuals inside of the vehicle were trapped in the burning car. The complaint alleged that the electronic door systems stopped working due to the Lithium battery pack used to construct the door system. Several other previous lawsuits have also alleged that Tesla has failed to follow battery check standards and that Tesla vehicles faced issues with their battery capacity after a software update.
Apple
In
2020, Apple faced a class action suit, filed by consumers and tech
analysts, alleging that the company issued software updates that
knowingly impaired the lithium ion battery within their smartphones to
incentivize customers to purchase a new phone. Though Apple denies
wrongdoing, it has agreed to a $500 million settlement. This case
touches millions of consumers, and signals increasing liability for
manufacturers engaging in battery interference.
Hoverboards
There
have been several lawsuits filed against hoverboard companies that use
lithium ion batteries in their products. In December 2015, Michael Brown
filed a class action suit against Swagway Hoverboard and other parties
after a Swagway hoverboard caught fire and damaged his home. The suit
claimed that both Swagway and certain other defendants failed to warn
customers of the risk of combustion (Brown v. Swagway, LLC and Modell’s
Sporting Goods, Inc., 3:15-cv-588, (N.D. Indiana)). In March 2017,
Swagway’s motions to dismiss certain aspects of the suit were denied.
Cellphones
In
September 2016, Jonathan Strobel filed a suit against Samsung alleging
that his Samsung smartphone exploded in his pocket (Strobel v. Samsung
Electronics America, Inc. et al, 9:16-cv-81755 (S.D. Fla.)) and led to
severe burns. The suit sought unspecified damages for medical bills,
lost wages, pain and suffering, and more.
Electronic Cigarette Batteries
Alleged
malfunctions of electronic cigarettes generated more than 120 lawsuits
in U.S. courts in 2017. A few plaintiffs claimed that the cigarettes
exploded in their mouth and damaged teeth, or that groin burns resulted
from the e-cigarette exploding in a pocket. Extreme and permanent
facial injuries have been reported.
An award of $1.885 million
was issued on September 15, 2015 in a California e-cigarette products
liability suit, Jennifer Reis v. VAPCIGS (No. 1306769, Riverside
Superior Court). The plaintiff alleged that she suffered second-degree
burns to her extremities, severe emotional distress and PTSD as a result
of her e-cigarette charger catching fire while she was in a moving car.
The U.S. Fire Administration (USFA) (part of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency under the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security) has stated that it is the close proximity of “the known
explosion hazard” – meaning the lithium battery – to the user’s body
that leads to the severe injuries. The USFA noted that in a typical
e-cigarette battery failure, flammable electrolytes in the lithium
battery overheat and cause a build-up of pressure that leads to the
bursting apart of the seal at the end of the battery, resulting in
e-cigarette components being propelled with significant force. The USFA
advised that the current generation of lithium batteries was not a safe
source of energy for e-cigarettes and suggested that manufacturers seek
alternate power sources, but acknowledged that such decisions were left
to e-cigarette makers at this time.