Contents


    Executive Summary

    On July 23, 2016, the United Kingdom held a referendum on leaving the European Union that resulted in 52% of the population voting to leave. On January 31, 2020, the United Kingdom (UK) exited the European Union (EU). One reason behind the Brexit vote was a widespread desire to abandon the supremacy of E.U. law. The day after the referendum, David Cameron resigned from his post as Prime Minister of the U.K. The European Union, as the world’s largest market for insurance and reinsurance, provides insurance companies with single market access to the U.K. and 27 member states, reaching over 500 million E.U. consumers. Brexit was also the downfall of Theresa May, Cameron's successor, and is currently an ongoing issue for the current Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, who succeeded Liz Truss in October 2022.

    The vote to leave the E.U. has created an extensive level of uncertainty for insurers in the U.K. and across the global economy. While the UK and the EU agreed on the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) in December 2020, various aspects of financial services, including insurance, are still being negotiated. The TCA agreement did not provide the UK with the same level of access to the single market as EU membership, leading to a reorganization of operations for many financial firms. As a result, there has been a significant shift of assets and jobs from London to other EU financial hubs like Frankfurt, Paris, and Amsterdam. These changes have had a profound impact on the UK’s financial stability. The pound initially plunged to a thirty-year low after the referendum and has continued to experience significant volatility. While some businesses have adjusted, the long-term effects on the UK’s financial services industry, including insurance, remain uncertain. The sector continues to face challenges related to regulatory divergence, market access, and competition from other global financial centers.

    Background

    On July 23, 2016, 52% of voters in the United Kingdom opted to leave the European Union, which is colloquially referred to as “Brexit.” The European Union, which involves 27 countries, allows member states free trade policies, and free movement to work, live and travel. Between 2016 and 2020, the date of Brexit was consistently pushed back due disagreement over how the UK should withdraw from the EU.

    On March 29, 2017, Prime Minister Theresa May instructed the UK Representative to the EU to deliver the Brexit trigger letter to the President of the European Council. The letter signaled the beginning of Brexit talks and initiated the UK’s “grace period” aiming to help the 3 million EU nationals living in Britain to arrange their affairs and status in the UK. Negotiations dragged on, with UK negotiators repeatedly threatening to leave the EU with no deal in place. The debate shifted from the possibility of staying in the EU and focused around a “soft” vs. “hard” Brexit. A soft Brexit would have allowed the UK to continue to participate in the single market and accept the free movement of people, much like Norway does today. Alternatively, a hard Brexit, which the UK ultimately opted for, saw the UK leave the EU and refuse to compromise on such issues, giving up access to the single market and certain aspects of trade agreements.

    During her tenure as Prime Minister, Theresa May proposed three variations of a withdrawal agreement. All of them were voted down by Parliament. After the rejection of her final deal, May announced that she would be stepping down as Prime Minister on June 7, 2019. With this announcement came the candidacies of several prominent British politicians, including Boris Johnson and Jeremy Hunt. On July 24, 2019, Boris Johnson was chosen to lead the Conservative Party and became the new Prime Minister.

    Boris Johnson’s election raised the likelihood of a no-deal Brexit scenario. He famously stated he would rather be “dead in a ditch” than delay Brexit again. However, his approach faced resistance from within his own party and Parliament. When 21 Conservative MPs voted against Johnson’s no-deal stance, they were expelled from the party, causing him to lose his majority. Johnson then called for a snap election in December 2019, which resulted in a Conservative majority in Parliament, enabling him to push forward his Brexit agenda. May tried a similar route during her time as Prime Minster, only to lose her majority in a landslide and her ability to pass any deal through Parliament.

    As Prime Minster, Johnson suspended Parliament for the longest period since WWII in order to limit opposition to his no-deal Brexit strategy. Despite legal challenges, this move demonstrated Johnson’s determination to deliver Brexit on the original agreed upon date, rather than extending the deadline. The UK formally left the EU on January 31, 2020, marking the beginning of a transition period during which negotiations for the future UK-EU relationship took place. This period ended on December 31, 2020, with the UK fully withdrawing from the EU’s regulatory framework.

    The culmination of Brexit negotiations resulted in an agreement known as the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) between the UK and the EU. The agreement outlines the future relationship in areas such as trade, security, and regulatory alignment. This agreement aimed to mitigate the potential disruptions caused by Brexit, although it did not provide the same level of market access as EU membership. Furthermore, in a bid to strengthen its financial sector post-Brexit, the UK recently struck a “first of its kind” financial services deal with Switzerland in December of 2023. This landmark agreement aims to enhance cooperation and market access between the two countries’ financial services sectors. The deal is expected to facilitate smoother cross-border services, benefiting insurance and reinsurance firms among others, by reducing regulatory barriers and promoting mutual recognition of regulations. While the immediate challenges posed by Brexit have largely been navigated, the long-term effects on the UK’s financial services sector and broader economy remain subjects of ongoing scrutiny and adaptation.

    Injuries and Damages

    Analysts at the Office for Budget Responsibility estimate that the post-Brexit trading relationship between the UK and the EU, as outlined in the TCA, will reduce long-run productivity in the UK by 4% relative to remaining in the EU. Additionally, a new report published in January 2024 by Cambridge Econometrics shows that London’s economy has shrunk by more than £30billion. The report further calculates that there are nearly two million fewer jobs overall in the UK due to Brexit, with almost 300,000 fewer jobs in the capital alone. Other damages include:

    U.K. Access to the Single Market

    Since the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, London’s status as a global hub for insurance and reinsurance has faced challenges. Previously, EU membership granted UK-based insurers seamless access to a single market of over 500 million consumers, allowing them to underwrite insurance across all 27 member states on a cross-border basis. However, Brexit has disrupted this arrangement, necessitating new regulatory frameworks, leading to operational adjustments and the relocation of some operations to maintain market access. Additionally, the U.K. may not be able to continue localizing funds in other E.U. jurisdictions to meet liabilities due to future travel restrictions. Further, the U.K. represented one of the most open economic member states in the E.U., so the single market is likely to develop at a slower rate in the future.

    Foreign Direct Investment

    Historically, the United Kingdom attracted more foreign direct investment (FDI) than any other EU member state. However, post-Brexit, there has been a noticeable decline in FDI inflows. Brexit has led to a shift in FDI strategies, with companies relocating operations from the UK to EU member states to maintain market access. This relocation has boosted intra-EU investments, particularly in financial hubs like Frankfurt, Paris, and Dublin. However, overall FDI into both the UK and the EU has experienced volatility due to increased uncertainty and potential trade barriers. The evolving regulatory landscape and ongoing negotiations continue to influence investment decisions, adding a layer of complexity for businesses operating across these markets.

    Trade Agreements

    Most international trade agreements are negotiated directly with representatives of the European Union. Traditionally, trade agreements with the EU boost economic activity, stimulate demand for insurance and reinsurance, and create foreign accessibility to the UK reinsurance market. London has historically provided the most successful market to meet reinsurance demands. Since Brexit, the UK has faced challenges in securing new trade deals, leading to economic disruptions and uncertainties. The recent suspension of trade talks with Canada over agricultural disputes and the imposition of tariffs on UK exports like cheese are notable setbacks. Additionally, the loss of access to the EU market has resulted in a significant decrease in UK exports to the EU and increased operational complexities for businesses.

    Legislation and Regulation

    Since the Queen of England gave formal approval for Brexit on January 9th, 2020, the UK has navigated through a transitional period until December 31, 2020, during which negotiations with the EU shaped future terms. The UK diverged from the 1972 European Communities Act, marking the cessation of its EU membership and ending the precedent of European law over British parliamentary laws. Brexit also terminate the jurisdiction of the European law over British parliamentary laws. Brexit also terminated the jurisdiction of European Court of Justice in the UK. Approximately 80,000 regulations, covering areas from workers’ rights to environmental standards and trade agreements, were affected by this change.

    Following Brexit, the UK has undergone significant regulatory adjustments in the insurance and reinsurance sectors. The departure from EU regulations necessitated the creation of new frameworks and adaptations to existing laws, impacting market conduct rules, capital requirements, and consumer protection standards. Insurers have faced challenges in navigating regulatory divergence and ensuring compliance which has led to strategic reviews of their operational models and risk management frameworks.

    As of June 2024, the UK has established the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) to oversee insurance and financial markets, enhancing regulatory oversight and ensuring alignment with international standards. The UK’s approach post-Brexit includes negotiating bilateral agreements and accession to international regulatory bodies, such as the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS), to maintain market access and regulatory equivalence. Ongoing adjustments continue to shape the insurance landscape, with insurers focusing on resilience and adaptability in a dynamic regulatory environment shaped by Brexit and global economic shifts.

    Liability and Insurance

    Cut and paste straight from web page

    Litigation

    Since Brexit, litigation dynamics have evolved significantly, impacting how legal disputes involving EU and UK entities are handled. One notable aspect is the continued preference for English courts among EU parties for international litigation. This preference stems from England’s reputation as a global financial center, its robust legal system, which include procedural advantages like the absence of jury trials in civil cases and limited punitive damages, and the cost regime where the losing party typically pays legal costs. These factors have historically made English courts and attractive venue for resolving commercial disputes, despite Brexit introducing new challenges.

    However, Brexit has raised several concerns regarding the practicalities of litigation across borders. One major issue is the potential difficulty in serving legal documents to parties located in EU member states for English court proceedings. The withdrawal from EU-wide arrangements on judicial cooperation has necessitated new protocols and agreements to facilitate effective service of process and ensure that legal proceedings are properly initiated and followed. Moreover, questions have arisen about the enforceability of English court judgments in EU member states post-Brexit, as mutual recognition and enforcement mechanisms previously governed by EU regulations may no longer apply.

    In response to these challenges, legal professionals and policymakers have been actively seeking solutions to maintain effective cross-border litigation practices. The TCA includes provisions to temporarily maintain aspects of judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters. However, the agreement only provides a transitional framework, leaving long-term arrangements for mutual recognition of judgments and streamlined cross-border litigation procedures subject to ongoing negotiation and development.

    Future Outlook

    Brexit has unquestionably left a profound imprint on the UK economy, shaping its trajectory in ways that extend well into the future. The departure from the European Union has not only triggered immediate economic adjustments but also set the stage for longer-term transformations. Recent analyses have demonstrated that Brexit has led to a 2.5% reduction in UK GDP in 2023 relative to a baseline scenario in which it remained in the EU. Experts expect this trend to increase over time, reaching 5 or 6% by 2035, as the increased costs of trading and associated reductions in the terms of trade and productivity persist.

    Looking forward, the outlook remains complex and nuanced across various sectors, including insurance and reinsurance. These sectors, deeply integrated within the EU regulatory framework, face challenges stemming from regulatory misalignment and increased operational costs post-Brexit. The need to navigate divergent regulatory landscapes and potentially restricted market access poses ongoing uncertainties. Moreover, as the UK negotiates its position in global trade frameworks, particularly in services where it holds a significant competitive advantage, the insurance industry will be closely scrutinized for its adaptability and resilience in the face of shifting geopolitical and economic dynamics.

    Beyond economics, Brexit continues to reverberate through societal and political spheres, influencing debates over national identity, governance, and international relations. The full extent of these impacts will continue to unfold over the coming years, as the UK forges new relationships and recalibrates its global position. As such, while the aforementioned GDP projections are rather bleak, the resilience of UK industries, including insurance and reinsurance, will be crucial in determining how effectively the country navigates this period of transformation.

    In the News

    2020

    2019

    2018

    • UK's Brexit plan called 'real blow' to City - AFP (Business Standard) (07/12/2018)
      The British government's new blueprint for Brexit today drew a firm thumbs-down from the City, which warned it would damage both the all-important finance sector and the wider economy, but industry appeared happier. . . . The government, partly to avoid the return of a "hard border" between the Republic of Ireland and British-ruled Northern Ireland, has been at pains to map out a future customs plan to govern post-Brexit trade in goods with the European Union. . . . .But its new "white paper" gave little detail about the future of services, which account for 80 percent of the UK economy, including 2.2 million people employed in Britain's world-class financial sector.
    • EU Withdrawal Bill officially becomes law - BBC News (06/26/2018)
      The government's flagship Brexit legislation has officially become law, Speaker John Bercow has announced.
    • Brexit: Bill approved after May sees off rebellion - BBC News (06/20/2018)
      The government's Brexit bill has passed through Parliament after Theresa May saw off a revolt by Tory MPs.
    • Insurers hit shift button despite Brexit grace period - Carolyn Cohn, Huw Jones, REUTERS (05/04/2018)
      Lloyd’s of London, AIG, Allianz and other insurers are ignoring assurances and establishing new hubs in Britain and the European Union before Brexit in March 2019 to ensure access to customers. . . . The moves come despite a “standstill” transition agreement struck between Britain and the European Union in March of this year which is meant to avoid any such hasty relocations. . . . Insurers are being driven by the fact that after Brexit, European firms selling policies in Britain, as well as British and other non-European Union insurers with UK bases selling into Europe, will need to have local regulated entities. . . . Many contacted by Reuters have said they are starting to implement the second phase of their Brexit plans - submitting licence applications, hiring staff and shifting policies.
    • David Davis dismisses 'dystopian' Brexit theory as Brussels starts new Project Fear with cancer warning - Gordon Rayner, The Telegraph (02/20/2018)
      Brussels has launched its own version of Project Fear by suggesting British workers will be at a higher risk of cancer as a result of Brexit. . . . A European Commission briefing paper claims the UK could dilute health and safety laws in an attempt to “lower production costs”, which would result in “higher exposure to chemicals and carcinogens”. . . . David Davis, the Brexit Secretary, is irritated by the false claims and on Tuesday rubbished the idea that post-Brexit Britain will be a “dystopian” world akin to the Mad Max films.
    • Brexit and GDPR: What to Expect in 2018 - Shearman and Sterling (01/03/2018)
      In a referendum held Thursday, June 23, 2016, the citizens of the United Kingdom (the “UK”) voted to leave the European Union (“EU”) in the so-called “Brexit”. Although the European Union Referendum Act, which authorized holding the referendum, is silent as to further steps, last year the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 authorized the Prime Minister to notify the EU of the UK’s intent to withdraw. The Prime Minister made this notification on March 29, 2017 under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, which provides two years for the parties to negotiate a withdrawal agreement, unless the UK and the European Council unanimously decide to extend this period. Further Acts and proposals in the UK have also sought to give effect to the results of the referendum and prepare for the separation of the UK and EU. . . . One area of concern in the context of Brexit is the UK’s legal framework for privacy and data protection. The UK government has recognized that it will still be part of the EU when the General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”) comes into effect on May 25, 2018. The UK has stated that it will comply with the GDPR, and that its compliance will not be affected by Brexit. To this end, on August 7, 2017, the UK Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (the “DCMS”) published a Statement of Intent, in which it outlined the policy and objectives behind a proposed Data Protection Bill (the “Bill”), which was introduced in Parliament on September 13, 2017 and is currently making its way through both houses.

    2017

    • Travelers Europe to Create European Subsidiary in Dublin in Response to Brexit - Business Wire (12/19/2017)
      Travelers Europe today announced that it will apply to the Central Bank of Ireland for authorisation of a new, wholly owned insurance subsidiary incorporated in the Republic of Ireland. Based in Dublin, this new subsidiary will enable Travelers to continue to seamlessly serve its customers and broking partners in Ireland and across Europe when the UK exits the European Union, as currently planned in March 2019.
    • Travelers Europe to Create European Subsidiary in Dublin in Response to Brexit - Business Wire (12/19/2017)
      Travelers Europe today announced that it will apply to the Central Bank of Ireland for authorisation of a new, wholly owned insurance subsidiary incorporated in the Republic of Ireland. Based in Dublin, this new subsidiary will enable Travelers to continue to seamlessly serve its customers and broking partners in Ireland and across Europe when the UK exits the European Union, as currently planned in March 2019.
    • Brexit: UK insurers push for transition deal to preserve London as global hub after EU departure - Carolyn Cohn, Huw Jones, Independent (11/19/2017)
      British and European Union insurers need transitional agreements and a “mutual market access” deal to preserve London’s place as a global hub after Brexit, an insurance lobby group said on Wednesday.
      Britain also needs to negotiate a reinsurance agreement with the United States, one of the sector’s biggest markets, on a similar basis to a recent deal between the United States and the EU, Malcolm Newman, leader of the London Market Group’s Brexit task force, told Reuters.
      The EU’s bilateral trade deal for insurance with Switzerland could be a template for an insurance deal between Britain and the EU as it contains a mechanism for resolving disputes, Newman said. . . . Around 30 insurers, including the Lloyd’s of London specialist insurance market, have already announced plans for an EU subsidiary in the event of a hard Brexit, as they wait for clarity on a Brexit deal.
    • Brexit could cost UK ‘up to 75,000 financial jobs’ - Ben Woods , Belfast Telegraph (11/02/2017)
      A Bank of England official has said Britain’s powerhouse financial services sector could shed 10,000 jobs on day one of Brexit and it was “plausible” the losses may reach 75,000. . . . Sam Woods, head of the Bank’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), said the 10,000 figure was based on Brexit contingency plans submitted to the Bank by financial firms, which are assuming no replacement of passporting rights and no transition period beyond the end of March 2019. . . . While he made clear the 75,000 jobs number did not come from the Bank but consultants Oliver Wyman, he said it was a credible prediction of how Britain’s EU divorce may impact the finance sector.

    Additional Items

    By far and away the most well rounded and useful Cat-focused industry conference out there. Perfect for all levels within the industry. From the conference content, the presenters and the attendees, this conference is a can’t miss for those interested in expanding their knowledge and learning more about cat related insurance and reinsurance modeling topics Nick DiMuzio, Everest

    "Fantastic, enriching conference - brilliantly planned and run, illuminating talks and excellent opportunities for networking across multiple areas of catastrophic risk.” Gary Ackerman, University at Albany

    “From a treaty underwriter's point of view, RAA presented relevant topics related to today's macro events. Scientific presentations provided insight that I can incorporate in underwriting and share with my clients.” Eric B. Silberman, Munich Re

    "Great conference with some of the biggest names in the business presenting their work. What more could you ask for?” Ron Nash, Nash Consulting

    “A perfect introduction to the world of reinsurance. Relevant topics, great speakers and the opportunity to network with industry peers makes this a must go event.”
    Tom Barrett, Everest Re

    Demystifying Reinsurance was an excellent tool to clearly understand and break down the basics. Very good class and recommend it for beginners and even as a refresher course for the intermediate student.”
    Chenessia West, TransRe

    “Re Basics is the ideal opportunity whether an industry professional or student of insurance to understand the in and outs of reinsurance while being able to network with persons spread across the whole industry.”
    Darius Zuill, Bermuda Monetary Authority

    “This has been the best reinsurance seminar that I have been to! Whether a reinsurance seasoned vet or new to the field, this is an engaging seminar that addressed specific issues of the reinsurance market.”
    Michelle Thimm, Church Mutual Insurance 

    “Re Underwriting provided a comprehensive and interesting overview of underwriting in the current market with a major (and interesting) focus on trends. Very useful for underwriting and non-underwriting alike.”
    DeVika Bourne, PartnerRe

    “Very informative experience, and a great way to keep up to date on current underwriting events and trends.”
    Steven Whalen, Aspen Re

    “Time well spent in learning the updated underwriting business and networking!”
    Christine Chen,  Everest Re 

    “The panels and presentations were thought provoking and fascinating as numerous topics were covered affecting the industry. I’m leaving the conference with a greater insight of the future market.”
    Brittany de Frias, AXIS Capital 

     

    “RAA Re Finance was the first RAA seminar I attended, and I was thoroughly impressed with the speakers and content. I learned a great deal from the presentations and intend to bring some new ideas back to my company and share with the team!”
    Taylor Robinson, ICW Group

    “Fantastic slate of instructors who thoughtfully walked us through financial reporting and other aspects of reinsurance finance. They used terminology that non finance people (lawyers) could understand. Really great program.”
    Steven Bazil, The Bazil Group

    “If you are in Reinsurance Accounting/Finance, you need to take this course to help you with your job.”
    Frank Borawski, Markel  

    “The speakers were excellent! There is something to be said about a person, and in this case a group of people, who can take time away from their busy schedules and explain to everyone something they feel passionate about in a manner that's understandable. My only complaint is that I wish we had more time with them.”
    Jessica Mieles, Sompo International

    “The RAA ReContracts is the most comprehensive reinsurance contract wording training available in the U.S. market.”
    David Kragseth, Guy Carpenter   

    “The course was very helpful in addressing different viewpoints and important things to consider in contract design and review.”
    Andy Martin, AmericanAg 

    “The RAA contract course was very informative and interesting. It covered a wide range of Reinsurance Contracts Types. In my Reinsurance Career, I have had the opportunity to work on a limited type of contracts, so I learned a lot.”
    Vivian Castro, Arch Insurance Company 

    “The RAA Contracts course provides the opportunity to engage with relevant topics, taught by industry experts, in both seminar and small group environments. The course material and industry experts provide an understanding on a wide range of subjects.” 
    Kevin English, LMRe

    “Participation in Re Claims should be mandatory for all P&C reinsurance underwriters. It’s truly an eye-opener, providing an in-depth look from a claims manager’s perspective on what happens to the business that we underwrite. There are lots of do’s and don’ts to pay attention to. Re Claims answers all the hard questions."  Michael Delacruz, China Re P&C

    “I absolutely love this program. I learned so many new things. Reinsurance from the industry’s top executives, interactive activities, interesting panels, and innovating presentations makes for an intriguing few days. Well worth the time and money.” Chenessia West, TransRe

    “As a reinsurance attorney I find Re Claims highly valuable to stay abreast of emerging issues. Also, being walked through practical case studies is extremely helpful in creating a thorough understanding of how contracts work.” Steven Bazil, The Bazil Group

    Become a Re Scholar!

    The Re Ed Institute's Re Scholar Program seeks to recognize those who achieve a high standard of reinsurance education by completing the Re Scholar curriculum. Learn More.


    Become a Re Ed Sponsor

    The RAA’s Reinsurance Education Institute programs attract professionals from the world’s leading insurance/reinsurance companies, brokers, law firms and consulting firms. Interested in sponsoring? Contact Carolyn Fahey.